Ex Parte Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 727 So. 2d 173 - Ex Parte Smith · 677 So. 2d 246 - Pierson v. State · 828 So. 2d 952 - Ex Parte Thomas · Tyler v. State · Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘factors such as the prejudice to the petitioner of the court’s not accepting the petition and the prejudice to the opposing party of the court’s accepting it; the impact on the timely administration of justice in the trial court; and whether the appellate court has pending before it other proceedings relating to the same action, and as to which the jurisdiction of the appellate court is unchallenged.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Manassa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.