834 So. 2d 923 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 570 So. 2d 925 - Czubak v. State · 679 So. 2d 710 - Pope v. State · 662 So. 2d 323 - Allen v. State · 661 So. 2d 1182 - Pangburn v. State · 625 So. 2d 51 - Kirby v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“given all of the other evidence as to William's [sic] guilt, we cannot conclude that this error necessarily deprived Williams of a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.