Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 SW2D 404 - Warner v. Hurt

Warner v. Hurt’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2018

8 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cain v. Bain · Pool v. Ford Motor Co. · Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co. · Holley v. Watts · Herbert v. Herbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if we as a reviewing court might view the circumstances of this tragic case contrary to the way the jury did, we cannot become a thirteenth juror and substitute our judgment for theirs. In a battle of competing evidence, it is the sole obligation of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to weigh them testimony. It is the obligation of the respective advocates to persuade them in their decision. And it is our obligation to see that the process was fair and carried out according to the rules. We cannot under any circumstances re-try the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because the jury is the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their- testimony, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury’s simply because we ‘may disagree with the jury’s findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Admissibility of the expert's opinion hinges on whether or not the expert has special knowledge concerning [the] matter on which his opinion is sought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.