Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 SW2D 587 - Hicks v. Ricardo

Hicks v. Ricardo’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Krishnan v. Sepulveda (1995), Rosenboom MacHine & Tool, Inc. v. MacHala (1999)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

140199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 11th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Cain v. Bain · Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp. · Jackson v. Van Winkle · Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · M.J. Sheridan & Son Co. v. Seminole Pipeline Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the same circumstances that produced at least some of the previous mental anguish are likely to recur”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.