Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 290th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 59 Ill. 2d 102 - People v. Armour · LLS v. State · LLS v. State · Matter of MIL
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) After the petition has been filed, the juvenile court shall set a time for the hearing. ' (b) The time set for the hearing shall not be later than 10 working days after the day the petition was filed if: (1) the child is in detention; or (2) the child will be taken into custody under Section 53.06(d) of this code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re J.L.W.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.