United States v. Frederick’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.2d 1211 · 1987
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2017
15 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1510 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3147 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub · Dames & Moore v. Regan · New York v. Ferber · Burton v. United States · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]roper venue is not limited to districts where the defendants were physically present when they committed unlawful acts. So long as an overt act ... is intended to have an effect in the district where the case is finally brought, venue is proper.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.