Subias v. Meese’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.2d 1288 · 1987
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2023
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Jones v. Cunningham · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty. · Brownell v. We Shung · United States v. Giddings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the custodian must be amenable to service of process and the powers of the court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“can issue only from a court with jurisdiction over the prisoner or his custodian.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“denial of entry amounts to a restraint on liberty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.