Fillingim v. Boone’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.2d 1389 · 1988
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2017
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · United States v. O'Brien · Sandstrom v. Montana · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the ordinance in this ease was adopted pursuant to authority derived from the twenty-first Amendment, rather than from the municipality’s police power, “extensive and detailed legislative findings based upon substantial evidence that the prohibited activity contributed to criminal activity in the county are not required.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The invidiousness requirement is satisfied only if it can be established that the government's selective prosecution is motivated by constitutionally impermissible motives such as racial or religious discrimination or interference with the legitimate exercise of constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“nude or semi-nude entertainment in any commercial establishment at which alcoholic beverages are, or are available to be, sold, dispensed, consumed, possessed or offered for sale or consumption on the premises”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Geaneas v. Willets
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.