Streetman v. Lynaugh’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.2d 1521 · 1988
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2006 · most notably United States v. Garrett (1990), United States v. Mason (1995)
14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Pate v. Robinson · Barefoot v. Estelle · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Keeble v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'movant need not always show a probability of success on the merits, he must present a substantial case on the merits when a serious legal question is involved and show that the balance of the equities weighs heavily in the favor of granting the stay.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An order under 18 U.S.C. § 4241 requiring psychiatric or psychological examination calls for “ ‘an exercise of judicial discretion to determine if there is “reasonable cause to believe” that the defendant may be incompetent.’ ” Further, the “determination of reasonable cause is left in large part to the discretion of the district court” and reviewable for “abuse of such discretion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harper v. Parker“(1) whether the movant has made a showing of likelihood of success on the merits, (2) whether the movant has made a showing of irreparable injury if the stay is not granted, (3) whether the granting of the stay would substantially harm the other parties, and (4) whether the granting of the stay would serve the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Byrne v. Roemer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.