Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 F.2d 239 - Vanderwater v. Hatch

Vanderwater v. Hatch’s Empirical Analysis

835 F.2d 239 · 1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz · McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of Chicago · Hodel v. Indiana · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subject to exceptions when the conduct alleged clearly affects the fundamental fairness of the proceedings, an objection alleging juror misconduct may be rejected if not raised in a timely manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.