O'Halloran v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.2d 506 · 1987
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably Caswell v. Ryan (1992), Evans v. Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County (1992)
14 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Picard v. Connor · Commissioner v. Engle · Granberry v. Greer · McMahon P-7814 v. Fulcomer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is not enough that the petitioner presents to the state court the facts upon which a federal claim is based.” The claim must be substantially equivalent to that litigated in the state court. Both the legal theory and the facts supporting a federal claim must have been submitted to the state court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]nexcusable or inordinate delay by the state in processing claims for relief may render the state remedy effectively unavailable”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“claim is composed of fact and law, and both must be presented to the state court before a reasoned decision can be made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vincent James Landano v. John J. Rafferty, Superintendent, (East Jersey State Prison), Peter Perretti, (Attorney General, State of New Jersey), Leslie Fay Schwartz, (Deputy Attorney General), the Office of the Hudson County Prosecutor, Kearney Police Department, Newark Police Department, Jersey City Police Department and Perth Amboy Police Department, No. 89-5504, Honorable H. Lee Sarokin, U.S. District Court Judge, Nominal Vincent James Landano v. John J. Rafferty, Superintendent, Rahway State Prison, and Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey. Vincent James Landano v. John J. Rafferty, Superintendent (East Jersey State Prison), Peter Perretti, (Attorney General, State of New Jersey), Leslie Fay Schwartz, (Deputy Attorney General), the Office of the Hudson County Prosecutor, Kearney Police Department, Newark Police Department, Jersey City Police Department and Perth Amboy Police Department. Appeal of John J. Rafferty, Superintendent, East Jersey State Prison, and Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, in Nos. 89-5625 and 89-5638 · Landano v. Rafferty
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.