Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 F.2d 617 - Crady v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Crady v. Secretary of Health & Human Services’s Empirical Analysis

835 F.2d 617 · 1987

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
April 2013
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Higgs v. Bowen (1988), Daniels v. Apfel (1998)

23 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Heckler v. Campbell · Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Allen v. Califano · Hephner v. Mathews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he fact that age categories are not to be applied mechanically ... obviously does not mean that a claimant must be moved mechanically to the next age category whenever his chronological age is close to that category.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reopened the prior application, as he may do even though there is no express statement that he has done so.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “for unskilled persons of limited education or less who are limited to light work and are of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.