United States v. Bartle’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.2d 646 · 1987
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably United States v. Muhammad (1991), United States v. Cope (2002)
34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1545 · 18 U.S.C. § 1546
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · Bourjaily v. United States · Russell v. United States · Harris v. McRae
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by not moving the district court for a recess or continuance, is not in a position to fault the court for”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“may order such party to permit the discovery or inspection, grant a continuance, or prohibit the party from introducing evidence not disclosed, or it may enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Rule 16 does not require federal courts to exclude evidence not turned over to the discovering party in violation of a discovery order.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.