Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

835 F.2d 875

Docket No. 87-2133.

Raney v. Friedel Md

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 30, 1987. Decided Nov. 24, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on United States v. Barata-Jimenez

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Neil Raney, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order dismissing plaintiff's complaint alleging breach of contract and psychiatric malpractice is without merit. Because the dispositive issues have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Raney v. Friedel, C/A No. 87-1457-R (E.D.Va. July 1, 1987).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/835/f2d/875 · .json · Public domain