Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

835 F.2d 875

Docket No. 87-7270.

Spruill v. Long

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 30, 1987. Decided Dec. 11, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-12-11

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Barata-Jimenez

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-12-11

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Hubert Earl Spruill, pro se.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Spruill v. Long, C/A No. 87-490-CRT (E.D.N.C. July 2, 1987).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/835/f2d/875 · .json · Public domain