Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 F.2d 974 - White v. Bowen

White v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

835 F.2d 974 · 1987

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
June 2005
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2005

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

100198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1127 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Heckler v. Campbell · Wheeler v. Heckler · McKenzie v. Bowen · 600 F. Supp. 1513 - Gallo v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “simply is no clear statutory guidance on how to decide which retroactive benefits are to be calculated first.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Secretary with the option of reducing retroactive SSI benefits in lieu of retroactive OASDI [Title II] benefits. However, the amended section 1320a-6 in no way precludes the Secretary from continuing its policy of calculating retroactive SSI benefits prior to retroactive OASDI [Title II] benefits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Therefore, the Secretary's approach in eliminating this windfall constitute[d] a proper exercise of his discretion and represents a reasonable means of coordinating [Title II benefits], [Title XVI benefits], and state interim assistance programs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.