Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 F.2d 983 - United States v. Walker

United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

835 F.2d 983 · 1987

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably United States v. Torres (1990), United States v. Rosa (1993)

49 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

33019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1114

Relies on Glasser v. United States · United States v. Feola · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Logarusic v. United States · Utility Contractors, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'such a threat or display of physical aggression toward the officer as to inspire fear of pain, bodily harm, or death.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In order to protect the law enforcement function itself, the statute must be read as prohibiting any acts or threats of bodily harm that might reasonably deter a federal official from the performance of his or her duties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the 'force' element [of 18 U.S.C. 111(a)] is to be established by proof of threats rather than by proof of actual touching, the threat must have been of immediate harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.