Peppers v. Cobb County’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.3d 1289 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property in Greene & Tuscaloosa Counties · Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. Wells · Skop v. City of Atlanta · National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have treated the administrative exhaustion requirement as a 'jurisdictional prerequisite to filing a Title VII action.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e are obliged first to consider our power to entertain the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.