United States v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
835 F.3d 13 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Payton v. New York · Nix v. Williams · Steagald v. United States · Minnesota, v. Wayne Thomas Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e recite the key facts as found by the district court, consistent with the record support, noting where relevant [Rodríguez]'s contrary view of the testimony presented at the suppression hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n arrest warrant authorizes the police to enter a suspect's residence 'when there is reason to believe the suspect is within.' " United States v. Hamilton , 819 F.3d 503 , 506 (1st Cir. 2016) (quoting Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 , 603, 100 S.Ct. 1371 , 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980) ). "Even if it becomes known after entry that the residence is not the suspect's, the entry is justified if the police had 'reasonably believed' that (1) the suspect resided at the location and (2) the suspect would be present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen we review a challenge to a district court's denial of a motion to suppress, we are to 'view the facts in the light most favorable to the district court's ruling' on the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.