Fue v. Biter

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Filed August 4, 2016

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2016-08-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2016

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-08-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office (Los Angeles), Los Ange-les, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Yun K. Lee, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondenb-Appellee.

¶3ORDER

¶4THOMAS, Chief Judge:

¶5Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.