Chamberlin v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc. · Knill v. Knill · United States v. Hadaway · Athas v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“entire principal amount outstanding and accrued interest thereon shall become due and payable at the option of my clients.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chamberlin v. Carter“sufficiently clear and certain as fairly to apprise the personal representative of what the claimant[s][are] seeking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chamberlin v. Carter“substantially complied with the requirements of the applicable Maryland statutes”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chamberlin v. Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.