Reemer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 352 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on United States v. Anderson · United States v. Cassiere · Hammon v. State · United States v. Johnson · Connell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the Iowa Supreme Court observed, “the contemporary nature of pharmaceutical practice exemplifies the inherent trustworthiness” of the labels on cold medication. [State v. Heuser, 661 N.W.2d 157, 164 (Iowa 2003) ]. Indeed, physicians, patients and the general public routinely rely on regulated manufacturing practices and mandatory labeling to assure that pharmaceuticals are as they are represented to be.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Market quotations, tabulations, lists, directories, or other published compilations, generally used and relied upon by the public or by persons in particular occupations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Forler v. State“that labels of commercially marketed drugs are properly admitted into evidence under the exception provided by Evidence Rule 803(17) to prove the composition of the drug.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Forler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.