Bridges v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Warren v. State · Parker v. State · Hopkins v. State · Bank of New York v. Nally · Hopkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the trial court incorrectly failed to read the Section 19 instruction among the other final instructions, it is very significant that this instruction was given to the jurors both orally and in writing among the preliminary instructions only a day before, and also provided to them in written form for use during deliberations. Under these circumstances, we find that the trial court’s omission of the Section 19 instruction when it re-read its preliminary instructions among the final instructions does not warrant reversal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Shouse v. State · Townsend v. State“A defendant is entitled to have a proper Section 19 instruction presented to the jury in both preliminary - and final - instructions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Sample v. State · Shouse v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.