Jacobs v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Ring v. Arizona · Bousley v. United States · Atkins v. Virginia · Penry v. Lynaugh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“includes those rules that place “certain kinds of primary, private individual conduct beyond the power of the criminal-law making authority to proscribe,’’ Teague, 489 U.S. at 307 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , and includes rules "prohibiting a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense.” Penry, 492 U.S. at 330 , 109 S.Ct. 2934 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Leatherwood v. State“[W]e reaffirm our commitment to the general rule that ‘courts must sentence defendants under the statute in effect at the time the defendant committed the offense.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Corcoran v. Neal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.