Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 So. 2d 112 - Watson v. State

835 So. 2d 112 - Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 598 So. 2d 731 - Balfour v. State · 771 So. 2d 883 - Spann v. State · 423 So. 2d 1311 - Ashley v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any statement given freely and voluntarily without any compelling influences is, of course, admissible in evidence. The fundamental import of the privilege [against self-incrimination] while an individual is in custody is not whether he is allowed to talk to the police without the benefit of warnings and counsel, but whether he can be interrogated. Volunteered statements of any kind are not barred by the Fifth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause the Strickland decision is a plurality decision on the point of whether a bifurcated trial is required, it has no precedential value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Consequently, in addition to lacking merit, this issue is also procedurally barred from review by this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.