835 So. 2d 1205 - Cherry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 570 So. 2d 404 - Hernandez v. State · 756 So. 2d 1072 - Miller v. State · 775 So. 2d 403 - Cherry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even though [the codefendant’s] defense was not hostile toward appellant’s, neither incriminated the other, and the state did not make an argument that appellant was guilty by association with [the codefendant], the record attachments do not conclusively refute the possibility that the jury utilized the evidence against Wilson in convicting appellant.... [T]he records do not conclusively refute the allegation that appellant’s attorney should have sought a severance ... and that his failure to do so prejudiced the outcome of the case against appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.