Lacy v. Mini Warehouse World’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 538 So. 2d 794 - Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY. · 531 So. 2d 860 - Bussey v. John Deere Co. · 604 So. 2d 408 - Renfro v. Georgia Power Co. · City of Orange Beach v. Duggan · Watkins v. BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`"When reviewing a ruling on a motion for a summary judgment, this Court applies the same standard that the trial court used `in determining whether the evidence before the court made out a genuine issue of material fact.' Bussey v. John Deere Co ., 531 So.2d 860 , 862 (Ala. 1988). When a party moving for a summary judgment makes a prima facie showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, the burden shifts to the nonmovant to present substantial evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact. Bass v. SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County , 538 So.2d 794 , 797-98 (Ala. 1989). . . . In reviewing a ruling on a motion for a summary judgment, this Court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant and entertains such reasonable inferences as the jury would have been free to draw. *Page 560 Renfro v. Georgia Power Co ., 604 So.2d 408 , 411 (Ala. 1992)." "' City of Orange Beach v. Duggan , 788 So.2d 146 , 149 (Ala. 2000).' " Watkins v. Board of Managers of Birmingham Ret. Relief Sys ., 802 So.2d 190 , 193 (Ala. 2001)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' City of Orange Beach v. Duggan , 788 So.2d 146 , 149 (Ala. 2000).'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.