Castillo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · State Ex Rel. Grady v. Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) It is unlawful for any person corruptly to give, offer, or promise to any public servant, or, if a public servant, corruptly to request, solicit, accept, or agree to accept, any pecuniary or other benefit not authorized by law, for the past, present, or future performance, nonperformance, or violation of any act or omission which the person believes to have been, or the public servant represents as having been, either within the official discretion of the public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Castillo“the absence of any spoken understanding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Castillo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.