Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 SO2D 306 - Castillo v. State

Castillo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · State Ex Rel. Grady v. Coleman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) It is unlawful for any person corruptly to give, offer, or promise to any public servant, or, if a public servant, corruptly to request, solicit, accept, or agree to accept, any pecuniary or other benefit not authorized by law, for the past, present, or future performance, nonperformance, or violation of any act or omission which the person believes to have been, or the public servant represents as having been, either within the official discretion of the public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the absence of any spoken understanding,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.