Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 So. 2d 623 - State v. Duncan

835 So. 2d 623 - State v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · Epps v. West · Hetzel v. Prince William County · State v. Ortiz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Criminal negligence exists when, although neither specific nor general criminal intent is present, there is such disregard of the interest of others that the offender's conduct amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(2)(b) When the offender is engaged in the perpetration of cruelty to juveniles, even though he has no intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A. Second degree murder is the killing of a human being: (1) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm; or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.