Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 835 SW2D 636 - Coronado v. State

Coronado v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
5
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2011

16 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Coffman v. State · Irby v. State · Coronado v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of student for safety reasons was justified; however, subsequent searches of student's clothing, person, locker, and vehicle were not reasonably related to any discovery from the initial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “First, a court must determine whether the search was justified at its inception. A search of a student by a teacher or school official is justified at its inception when there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated, or is violating, either the law or the rules of the school. Second, a court must determine whether the search, as actually conducted, was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. A search is permissible in its scope when the measures adopted and used are reasonably related to the objectives of the search and are not excessively intrusive in light of the age and sex of the student and the nature of the infraction. See, T.L.O., 469 U.S. at 339-341 , 105 S.Ct. at 742-743 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he accommodation of the privacy interests of school children with the substantial need of teachers and administrators for freedom to maintain order in the school does not require strict adherence to the requirement that searches be based on probable cause to believe that the subject of the search has violated or is violating the law. Rather, the legality of a search of a student should depend simply on the reasonableness, under all the circumstances, of the search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.