State v. Villa-Perez’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 102 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably State v. Edwards (2003), State v. Deck (1999)
2 federal appellate · 102 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Terry v. Ohio · Blockburger v. United States · Carroll v. United States · United States v. Sokolow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the same conduct of a person may establish the commission of more than one offense he may be prosecuted for each such offense. He may not, however, be convicted of more than one offense if (1) One offense is included in the other, as defined in section 556.046; or (2) Inconsistent findings of fact are required to establish the commission of the offenses; or [[Image here]] (4) The offense is defined as a continuing course of conduct and the person’s course of conduct was uninterrupted, unless the law provides that specific periods of such conduct constitute separate offenses.” § 556.041.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Polson · State v. Good“(1) It is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; or (2) It is specifically denominated by statute as a lesser degree of the offense charged; or (3) It consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or to commit an offense otherwise included therein.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Polson · Tilley v. State“'[a] search of an automobile on the highways pursuant to probable cause to believe that contraband, weapons or evidence of a crime are within the automobile exception is a well established exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. West · State v. Cook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.