Gatz’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2023
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Aro Corp. v. Allied Witan Co. · Farina v. Mission Investment Trust · Callie v. Near · KMW International v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“district court must hold an evidentiary hearing ... when there is a substantial factual dispute concerning the existence or terms of the settlement agreement....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.