Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 F.2d 1249 - Paulson v. Bowen

Paulson v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

836 F.2d 1249 · 1988

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
August 2001
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2001 · most notably Shalala v. Schaefer (1993), Sullivan v. Hudson (1989)

31 federal appellate · 1 district ·

360198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412

Relies on John VARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee · Podedworny v. Harris · Vazquez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Jones v. Heckler · Warmoth v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]recedent final opinions and orders and statements of policy and interpretations that have been adopted by the Administration and that are not published in the FEDERAL REGISTER....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to be relied upon as precedent in determining cases where the facts are basically the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.