Giarratano v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
836 F.2d 1421 · 1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1963 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nature of capital cases, the complexity addressed in this record refers to factual complexity and the need for factual”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Giarratano v. Murray“attempting to meet the needs of over 2,000 prisoners,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Giarratano v. Murray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.