Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 F.3d 1102 - Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

836 F.3d 1102 · 2016

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. · 24 Cal. 4th 83 - Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc. · Miller v. Gammie · 17 Cal. 3d 699 - Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as it otherwise provides, this Arbitration Provision is intended to apply to the resolution of disputes that otherwise would be resolved in a court of law or before any forum other than arbitration, with the exception of proceedings that must be exhausted under applicable law before pursuing a claim in a court of law or in any forum other than arbitration. Except as it otherwise provides, this Arbitration Provision requires all such disputes to be resolved only by an arbitrator through final and binding arbitration on an individual basis only and not by way of court or jury trial, or by way of class, collective, or representative action. Except as provided in Section 15.3(v), below, regarding the Class Action Waiver, such disputes include without limitation disputes arising out of or relating to interpretation or application of this Arbitration Provision, including the enforceability, revocability or validity of the Arbitration Provision or any portion of the Arbitration Provision. All such matters shall be decided by an Arbitrator and not by a court or judge. However, as set forth below, the preceding sentences shall not apply to disputes relating to the interpretation or application of the Class Action Waiver or PAGA Waiver below, including them enforceability, revocability or validity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, the relationships that result from this agreement, the breach of this Agreement or the validity or application of any of the provisions of this Section 4, and, if the dispute cannot be settled through negotiation, the dispute shall be resolved exclusively by binding arbitration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Such disputes include without limitation disputes arising out of or relating to interpretation or application of this Arbitration Provision, including the enforceability, revocability, or validity of the Arbitration Provision or any portion of the Arbitration Provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.