Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 F.3d 1239 - Mendiola-Martinez v. Arpaio

Mendiola-Martinez v. Arpaio’s Empirical Analysis

836 F.3d 1239 · 2016

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
June 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2022

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

14020162020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Estelle v. Gamble · Wolff v. McDonnell · Farmer v. Brennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Eighth Amendment protections apply only once a prisoner has been convicted of a crime, while pretrial detainees are entitled to the potentially more expansive protections of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “in excessive force and conditions of confinement cases, we instruct juries to defer to prison officials' judgments in adopting and executing policies needed to preserve discipline and maintain security”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “must show a serious medical need by demonstrating that failure to treat a prisoner's condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.