Kaufman v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
836 F.3d 137 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 47 U.S.C. § 549
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assure the commercial availability, to consumers ... of ... equipment used ... to access multichannel video programming and other services offered over multichannel video programming systems, from manufacturers, retailers, and other vendors not affiliated with any multichannel video programming distributor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“a consumer wants to purchase a bundle of the alleged tying and tied products, the seller is simply satisfying consumer demand and monopolization concerns are irrelevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.