Smith v. Dickhaut’s Empirical Analysis
836 F.3d 97 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2024
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Rock v. Arkansas · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'a determination of a factual issue made by a State court shall be presumed to be correct' unless rebutted 'by clear and convincing evidence.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this circuit has routinely held petitioners to the § 2254(e)(1) 'clear and convincing' standard”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in a case in which resolving the fit between the two sections would appear to have made any difference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.