Loomis v. Cornish’s Empirical Analysis
836 F.3d 991 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2025
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 504 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. · Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r · Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants · Smith v. Jackson · Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish copyright infringement, a plaintiff must prove two elements: '(1) ownership of a valid copyright, and (2) copying of constituent elements of the work that are original.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]ecause the affidavit was not based on personal knowledge and because it relied on inadmissible hearsay testimony, the district court properly rejected it”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ortiz v. Alvarez“A party may object that the material cited to support or dispute a fact cannot be presented in a form that would be admissible in evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ortiz v. Alvarez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.