Dunn v. Hindman’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Gerstein v. Pugh · Michigan v. Doran · Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Hogan v. O'Neill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n individual brought into the asylum state involuntarily, unlawfully, or under compulsion is still a fugitive from justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“fear for his personal safety was not sufficient to justify his flight from justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.