Diehl v. Ogorewac’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Although Neumeier One is facially inapplicable to the present dispute since the parties reside in different states, this Court finds their diversity to be of no moment where the substantive law of each domicile is harmonious.... [P]arties to the present dispute have voluntarily aligned themselves with states that share a common perspective on this issue of law....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 22 F. Supp. 2d 169 - Tkaczevski v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

2. “the multi-state system will best be served by applying the law of the forum when it is substantially identical to the domiciles of both plaintiffs and defendants,” and that imposing New York law would both “[hold] parties to a standard of care consistent with the law of their domicile,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Heisler v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.