Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 FSUPP2D 1007 - Yahoo! Inc. v. Iversen

Yahoo! Inc. v. Iversen’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
December 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 4

Relies on Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams · Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A written provision in any maritime transaction or a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, or the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.” 9 U.S.C. § 2 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Incorporating the possibility of a future rule by reference simply doesn’t even meet the basic requirements for a valid incorporation by reference under simple state contract law. Most basically, what is being incorporated must actually exist at the time of the incorpoi'ation, so the parties can know exactly what they are incorporating.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.