Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

836 N.E.2d 243

In re Haney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2005

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2005-10-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Dunn v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. (2005), Bradshaw v. Chandler (2009)

4 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

230200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND CONCLUDING PROCEEDING

¶2Respondent, Stephen R. Haney, tendered to this Court on October 3, 2005 his resignation from the bar of this State, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 17.

¶3While serving as a deputy prosecutor in Marion County, in front of a jury in a felony case, respondent made several unprofessional and inappropriate comments directed to or about opposing defense counsel. The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Indiana filed a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action against the respondent on September 30, 2005. In his affidavit of resignation, respondent acknowledged that the material facts alleged are true, and submitted his resignation admitting that if the disciplinary proceeding were to be prosecuted, he could not successfully defend himself.

¶4And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the tendered resignation satisfies the requirements of Admis.Disc.R. 28, Section 17, and that, accordingly, it should be accepted.

¶5IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the resignation from the bar of this State tendered by the respondent, Stephen R. Haney, is hereby accepted. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to strike his name from the Roll of Attorneys. In order to be readmitted, he must comply with the reinstatement provisions contained in Admis.Disc. R. 23, Section 4.

¶6IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by virtue of the respondent's resignation from the bar of this State, any attorney disciplinary proceedings pending against him are hereby dismissed as moot.

¶7The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to the respondent or his attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities pursuant to Ad-mis.Disc.R. 23, Section 3(d).

All Justices concur.
/836/ne2d/243 · .json · Public domain