Vickers v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2011
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · United States v. Indrelunas · CITY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. v. Owens · Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co. · Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(B) Style of Petition in Error. The style and the sequence of the parties in an appeal shall be exactly the same as the style and sequence in the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken. 20 O.S.1991 3002. Designations such as "et al.” shall not be used in the style. Each party shall be designated in the caption as they were in the trial court followed by a slash "/" behind the trial court designation....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“I would dismiss the petition in error as utterly inefficacious for the commencement of [attorney's] appeal. Neither the caption nor the body of the petition designates this lawyer as a party appellant herein. The omission constitutes a fatal jurisdictional defect. No less authority than our nation's highest tribunal is unequivocally committed to this mechanical norm of adjective law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The designation of parties in the caption of any cause appealed to the Supreme Court or the Court of Criminal Appeals shall correspond with the sequence in which the designation of the parties appeared in the trial court case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.