Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 P.2d 1384 - State v. Bagshaw

State v. Bagshaw’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bonham v. Morgan · Brinkerhoff v. Forsyth · Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. Finlinson · Ward v. Richfield City · Williams v. Public Service Com'n of Utah

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) If the court, having regard to the nature and circumstances of the offense of which the defendant was found guilty and to the history and character of the defendant, concludes it would be unduly harsh to record the conviction as being for that degree of offense established by statute and to sentence the defendant to an alternative normally applicable to that offense, the court may unless otherwise specifically provided by law enter a judgment of conviction for the next lower degree of offense and impose sentence accordingly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.