Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

836 So. 2d 447

State ex rel. L.A.H.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 2002

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 2002-12-20

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2013

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-12-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

hPETTIGREW, J.,

¶1concurring.

¶2I respectfully concur because the majority opinion reflects the current law of the First Circuit Court of Appeal. However, I am of the humble opinion that Juvenile Code Arts. 905, 909, 910, 911, and 912 provide authority to the juvenile court judge to modify dispositions to insure and review the conditions, supervisions, treatments, and rehabilitation programs for the children in a broader manner than which is presently defined by the First Circuit Court of Appeal. Nevertheless, since the majority’s opinion does reflect the current law of the First Circuit Court of Appeal, I am compelled to follow it.

/836/so2d/447 · .json · Public domain