Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 SW2D 459 - Hagan v. State

Hagan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
4
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Bernard (1993), State v. Driver (1995)

99 state decisions

560199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Pearce · Hill v. Lockhart · Benton v. Maryland · Bordenkircher v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where on the face of the record the court had no power to enter the conviction or impose the sentence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Beyond simply protecting defendants from successive prosecutions for the same offense after an acquittal or a conviction, the Fifth Amendment also prohibits multiple punishments for the same offense.... The prohibition against multiple punishments is “designed to ensure that the sentencing discretion of ... court[s] is confined to the limits established by the legislature.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “‘When the same conduct of a person may establish the commission of more than one offense he may be prosecuted for each such offense. He may not, however, be convicted of more than one offense if (1) One offense is included in the other, as defined in section 556.046_””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.