Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 SW2D 558 - Gable v. State

Gable v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Baxter v. Rose · Swanson v. State · Lowe v. State · Sloan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his case differs from Swanson in one crucial respect. In Swanson, we reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the pro se petition because the trial court failed to provide the petitioner with the aid of counsel and a reasonable opportunity to amend the petition as required by Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 40-30-107 and 40-30-115. Swanson, 749 S.W.2d at 736 . In this case, however, the petitioner was given both the aid of counsel and a reasonable opportunity to amend his petition after counsel had been appointed to represent him, and no amendment to the petition was ever prepared or filed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.