Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 836 S.W.2d 75 - State v. Simpson

State v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2007

3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

15019922000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Schellert v. State · State v. Crow · State v. Miller · State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The seriousness of the offense alleged and whether the protection of the community requires transfer to the court of general jurisdiction; (2) Whether the alleged offense involved viciousness, force and violence; (3) Whether the offense alleged was against persons or property ...; (4) Whether the offense alleged is part of a repetitive pattern of offenses ...; (5) The record and history of the child...; (6) The sophistication and maturity of the child ...; (7) The program and facilities available to the juvenile court in considering disposition; and (8) Whether the child can benefit from the treatment or rehabilitative programs available to the juvenile court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for entry of a new plea to the State's charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.