Sharp Corp. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
837 F.2d 1058 · 1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Consolidated Bearings Company v. United States (2003), Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United States (1998)
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 160 · 19 U.S.C. § 1675 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · 103 S. Ct. 247 - Beneficial Finance of Kansas, Inc. v. United States · Poythress v. Duncan · Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. · Freeport Minerals Company, (Freeport-Mcmoran, Inc.) v. The United States, Shell Canada Resources Ltd. And Canadian Superior Oil, Ltd., Intervenors
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[J]udicial review of administrative action is inappropriate unless and until the person seeking to challenge that action has utilized the prescribed administrative procedures for raising the point.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We are not suggesting, however, that Commerce may never consider data concerning events after publication of the tentative decision to revoke * * * we cannot say that in order to determine whether there is 'no likelihood of resumption of sales at less than fair value,’ the Secretary may not consider events after the date of the tentative revocation decision. The extent to which such post-tentative revocation decision data are required is a matter largely within the Secretary’s discretion, and the answer depends upon the facts of the particular case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The government has recognized the power of the Court of International Trade to grant such affirmative relief in appropriate circumstances. The determination whether to do so and the terms and conditions of any directive to Commerce are matters for the Court of International Trade to determine in the first instance, in the exercise of its sound discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.